Q: How has photography changed your approach to painting?
A: Except for many hours spent in life-drawing classes and still life setups that I devised when I was learning my craft in the 1980s, I have always worked from photographs. My late husband, Bryan, would shoot 4” x 5” negatives of my elaborate “Domestic Threats” setups using his Toyo-Omega view camera. I rarely picked up a camera except when we were traveling. After Bryan was killed on 9/11, I inherited his extensive (film) camera collection – old Nikons, Leicas, Graphlex cameras, etc. – and needed to learn how to use them. Starting in 2002 I enrolled in a series of photography courses (about 10 over 4 years) at the International Center of Photography in New York. I learned how to use all of Bryan’s cameras and how to make my own big color prints in the darkroom.
Early on I discovered that the sense of composition, color, and form I had developed over many years as a painter translated well into photography. The camera was, and is, just another medium with which to express ideas. Pastel painting will always be my first love. However, pastel paintings take months of work, while photography offers instant gratification, especially with my current preferred camera, an iPad Pro.
Comments are welcome!
Posted on March 20, 2021, in Alexandria (VA), Creative Process, Domestic Threats, Pastel Painting, Photography, Working methods and tagged approach, camera, changed, collection, color prints, composed, composition, courses, current, darkroom, developed, devised, discovered, elaborate, enrolled, express, extensive, Graphlex, husband, inherited, instant gratification, International Center of Photography, iPad Pro, learning, medium, negatives, New York, Nikons, painter, painting, pastel painting, photography, preferred, series, setups, starting, still life, Toyo-Omega, translated, traveling, view camera. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.